"At my current job, training is often reactive rather than proactive. When designing reactively, I usually resort to the Successive Approximation Model. I prefer it because I often have limited time to analyze. Because it is agile, I have the opportunity to analyze results and apply improvements almost in real-time. It's the most viable when I have limited time to develop a course. Plus, training is rarely something we conduct only once. So the SAM framework is perfect because we can evaluate after a pilot run and improve before the next one.

On the other hand, when designing proactively, I often employ ADDIE or ASSURE. The latter differs from the ADDIE model in that it typically caters to learners through technology and media. I like that it is very objective-driven, which is crucial in a corporate setting. We often get a clear target metric to work towards, so it's essential for us to select delivery methods based on the skills, knowledge, and attributes associated with the target metric. It's like working backward by identifying the target metric, then parsing out the behaviors that contribute to it, and then focusing on honing the skills and attributes that promote the correct behavior."