When conducting scientific research, how often do you create alternative scenarios for potentially unexpected outcomes?
"I am ready to adapt at all times. Alternate scenarios are a must in science-based research. One of my professors taught me to always work in 'what-ifs' because, in science, plans change and fail on a regular basis."
"I frequently received and gave feedback at my last job. I proactively scheduled a weekly touch base with my manager to seek out feedback and connect on pressing issues. The feedback was often positive, and I would take the lead navigating situations I was unclear on by enlisting the expertise of my peers."
As an environmental scientist, you need to be ready for unexpected outcomes when it comes to your research and findings. Being able to problem solve and think outside the box when it comes to changing situations is a valuable skill set. Talk to the interviewer about your ability to create a variety of potential scenarios.
"I feel that it is essential to create alternative scenarios in all research situations. One cannot guess what will happen in the end, so it is great to be prepared for all possible outcomes."
Community answers are written by other candidates practicing this set. Reading how others frame the same question is one of the fastest ways to sharpen your own.
Anonymous Answer
--- Science, in general, is full of uncertainty, it's best to work in "what-ifs", plans change and fail on a regular basis. Trial and error is something I'm all too familiar with, one needs to be able to adapt in order to overcome. Also, it helps to have more experienced people around you to help navigate to a possible solution.
Amanda's Feedback
I can see the general idea in your answer; however, it needs to address the question more directly. This is a situational question asking specifically about how often you develop alternative scenarios in a research setting. This is an opportunity to share your research experience. If you don't have experience with scientific research scenarios, you can indicate that and then follow up by explaining how alternative scenarios benefit the research process.
