Should medical students who receive federal funds have first shots at residency program matches? spend time practicing medicine in a less desired area, to give something in return?

"I believe that, because there is such a huge shortage of physicians in rural areas, students receiving federal assistance should do their part by practicing in these areas for a certain amount of time. I think the HPSA shortage area commitment is doing great things for a three-year commitment now. Regarding the residency match process, I think the fairest way to handle that is to match the best students into their top programs of choice, regardless of financial status and federal fund status."

You can share with the interviewers your thoughts on this, but remain positive and try to show your ability to see both sides of the coin. You want to portray that you see the residency matching program as a fair opportunity for the best students to match into their top programs.

"Recognizing students who receive federal aid is important. Nevertheless, I believe the main goal of residency programs should be to hire young physicians who will best serve a program's hospital and community. Student academic performance and service record should be highly considered."

Community answers are written by other candidates practicing this set. Reading how others frame the same question is one of the fastest ways to sharpen your own.